<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for zacharyc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zacharyc.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zacharyc.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ConEd Does Not Accept Visa, Are You Kidding Me? by sbarrkum</title>
		<link>http://zacharyc.com/2008/04/03/coned-does-not-accept-visa-are-you-kidding-me/comment-page-1/#comment-2034</link>
		<dc:creator>sbarrkum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyc.com/2008/04/03/coned-does-not-accept-visa-are-you-kidding-me/#comment-2034</guid>
		<description>Con Ed payments have been &lt;b&gt;outsourced&lt;/b&gt; to NCO Financial Systems from about mid 2009.  &lt;b&gt;Visa&lt;/b&gt;  has not allowed NCO Financial Systems  to accept payments as NCO financial status is a mess.  That is why Con Ed customers cannot pay by Visa.

If you make a phone call,  the  customer service  is located in the Philippines.  The website to make Con Ed payments thru NCO is horrible.  A clear example of third world outsourced sub standard website that indicates designers who have no clue as to what is online payment .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Con Ed payments have been <b>outsourced</b> to NCO Financial Systems from about mid 2009.  <b>Visa</b>  has not allowed NCO Financial Systems  to accept payments as NCO financial status is a mess.  That is why Con Ed customers cannot pay by Visa.</p>
<p>If you make a phone call,  the  customer service  is located in the Philippines.  The website to make Con Ed payments thru NCO is horrible.  A clear example of third world outsourced sub standard website that indicates designers who have no clue as to what is online payment .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Self Portrait Photo Assignment by Aaron M</title>
		<link>http://zacharyc.com/2010/11/09/the-self-portrait-photo-assignment/comment-page-1/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyc.com/?p=899#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>I will also reluctantly accept your challenge. I&#039;m a photographer because I like to NOT be in photos but I can do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will also reluctantly accept your challenge. I&#8217;m a photographer because I like to NOT be in photos but I can do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Self Portrait Photo Assignment by suthee</title>
		<link>http://zacharyc.com/2010/11/09/the-self-portrait-photo-assignment/comment-page-1/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>suthee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyc.com/?p=899#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>great jump!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great jump!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Self Portrait Photo Assignment by Nathan Cormier</title>
		<link>http://zacharyc.com/2010/11/09/the-self-portrait-photo-assignment/comment-page-1/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Cormier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyc.com/?p=899#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>I reluctantly accept your challenge.  I will try not to forget to go out and take the shots.

I&#039;ll see if anyone else from our office/dept. wants in. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reluctantly accept your challenge.  I will try not to forget to go out and take the shots.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll see if anyone else from our office/dept. wants in. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dr. Oliver Ludwig by Tom Keebler</title>
		<link>http://zacharyc.com/2010/07/25/dr-oliver-ludwig/comment-page-1/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Keebler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyc.com/?p=858#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Hi Zach - 

We&#039;re thinking about putting together an issue of the Rhollout to go out and, obviously, want to highlight Doc (esp for those who may not know yet).  In pulling down one of his pictures, I came across your posting and wanted to pass along how nice I thought your piece was...Would you have any objections to my including it in the Rhollout (if space allows)?

Thanks for taking the time to pen the post.

T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Zach &#8211; </p>
<p>We&#8217;re thinking about putting together an issue of the Rhollout to go out and, obviously, want to highlight Doc (esp for those who may not know yet).  In pulling down one of his pictures, I came across your posting and wanted to pass along how nice I thought your piece was&#8230;Would you have any objections to my including it in the Rhollout (if space allows)?</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to pen the post.</p>
<p>T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Battle of The GTD Apps by zacharyc &#187; OmniFocus vs. Things (continued)</title>
		<link>http://zacharyc.com/2008/01/09/battle-of-the-gtd-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>zacharyc &#187; OmniFocus vs. Things (continued)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyc.com/?p=40#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>[...] while ago I wrote a post about my switch from OmniFocus from Omnigroup to Things by Cultured Code. Both do pretty much the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while ago I wrote a post about my switch from OmniFocus from Omnigroup to Things by Cultured Code. Both do pretty much the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mozy Site Redesign, bad blue text by Eric</title>
		<link>http://zacharyc.com/2010/02/17/mozy-site-redesign-bad-blue-text/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyc.com/?p=740#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>The bigger a company gets the more things change.  I like backzon.com, simple, and US based LIVE support.  All goes to the secure Amazon S3 server too.  

Nice observations by the way.

Cheers
Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bigger a company gets the more things change.  I like backzon.com, simple, and US based LIVE support.  All goes to the secure Amazon S3 server too.  </p>
<p>Nice observations by the way.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nuances in C: Struct Assignment in C by Priyesh Narayanan</title>
		<link>http://zacharyc.com/2008/03/13/nuances-in-c-struct-assignment-in-c/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Priyesh Narayanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyc.com/2008/03/13/nuances-in-c-struct-assignment-in-c/#comment-851</guid>
		<description>Zachary, two things: 
1. What you would find more interesting is that even in C++, this program wouldn&#039;t necessarily depend on the copy constructor - since you only have primitive types in your struct, any decent compiler would in turn let the built-in structure assignment capability take over, instead of generating a copy constructor. This could be called an optimization I guess, and would be compiler dependent. In fact, I was posting something related on my blog.

2. Your program needs correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zachary, two things:<br />
1. What you would find more interesting is that even in C++, this program wouldn&#8217;t necessarily depend on the copy constructor &#8211; since you only have primitive types in your struct, any decent compiler would in turn let the built-in structure assignment capability take over, instead of generating a copy constructor. This could be called an optimization I guess, and would be compiler dependent. In fact, I was posting something related on my blog.</p>
<p>2. Your program needs correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photo of the Day: MI6 Building by Richard</title>
		<link>http://zacharyc.com/2008/11/11/photo-of-the-day-mi6-building/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyc.com/?p=375#comment-597</guid>
		<description>Ahhh, the motherland...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, the motherland&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photo of the Day: MI6 Building by Udam Saini</title>
		<link>http://zacharyc.com/2008/11/11/photo-of-the-day-mi6-building/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Udam Saini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zacharyc.com/?p=375#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Nice photo. I like the look from the river.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice photo. I like the look from the river.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

